While the transmission profile is a text book Lorentzian, the profile of
transmission was curve-fitted with a Voigt function in order to avoid
an "overshoot" of the peaks of transmission.
Thanks to the dispersion of the spectroscope (0.0471 A/px),
the transmission profile is properly sampled resulting in an
accurate FWHM
estimation.
Strictly speaking, the measurement of the FWHM should be made on the
transmission profile = transmitted spectrum / solar spectrum (and not
on the profile of the tranmitted spectrum like here). In fact, when
this is done, results are quite similar. This is because the Ha line is
surrounded only by rather faint lines. So, there is
hardly any difference between measuring the FWHM of the transmisison (=
transmitted spectrum/ solar spectrum) and the FWHM of the peaks of
the transmitted spectrum.
Spectro measurement in a collimated beam at the focus of the Heliostar 76, with the etalon tuned on Ha: measurement #2
To cross-check the results, measurements
were also made with the SGH700 spectroscope, which has
a slightly lower spectral resolution. The optical setup is
the same as above, except for the spectroscope used.
Optical setup:Sun
=> Heliostar with etalon tuned on Ha (without BF) => slit of
the
spectro preciselly positioned at the focus of the Heliostar =>
SGH700 spectro with 10 microns × 4.5 mm slit, fc = 125 mm -
f i =200 mm, 2400 l/mm
grating, Player One IMX585, 0.0471
A/pixel dispersion.
Central part of the solar spectrum transmitted by the etalon when tuned on Ha:
The measured values are identical to the ones measured with the higher spectral resolution spectroscope :
FWHM = 0.30 A and FSR = 10.5 A
Measurement in diffuse light using a hydrogen discharge lamp
In this test, the Fabry-Perot
etalon is used as an interferometer. All the surface of the etalon is
sampled. The FWHM, FSR and air-gap are derived from the measurements of
the fringe system.
Ideally, the etalon would be removed from the Heliostar 76 OTA
to be tested. However, this was not possible. So the optical setup is:
Optical setup:
hydrogren
lamp => diffuser => Heliostar (without BF) with its etalon tuned
on Ha, its associated collimating optics and 76 mm objective
=> 135 mm f/1.8 Sigma lens (focused to the infinite) with Nikon Z7
II.
The hydrogen light source is behind the diffuser on the right.
The objective of the Heliostar faces the Sigma 135 mm f/1.8 lens of
the Nikon Z7 II on the left.
The etalon FWHM is measured at two tuning positions = Ha -0.1 A and Ha + 0.7 A:

Interference fringes obtained at -0.1 A (top) and and +0.7 A (bottom).
Sigma 135 mm f/1.8 - Nikon Z7 II - RAW mode - 14-bit acquisition - 0.62 s exposure time - 100 ISO
The FWHM measured for the two positions are identical : 0.37 A. Given
the measured width of the Ha line produced by the hydrogen lamp (FWHM =
0.263 A), the deconvoluted FWHM of the etalon is estimated at 0.27 A.
Based on the measurement of the fringe system and on the FSR value measured with the spectroscope, the air-gap is 0.20 mm.
In the end, we can consider
a conservative value of FWHM < 0.30 A, fully consistent with the spectrometer measurements.
Technical notes:
Keeping the etalon with both its collimating optics and the
objective of the telescope is not the "standard" way to perform
this test. Since the diffuse light comes from the focuser side of
the OTA:
- The focuser diameter acts like an aperture stop and decreases the
intensity of the diffuse light coming away from the optical axis. This
produces an effect similar to vignetting, reducing the amount of light
in the outer interference rings.
- Only the first two or three inner rings can be measured accurately because of the vigneting.
- The combination of the divergent collimating lens and of the main
objective of the Heliostar decreases the field angle, compared to the
"usual" implementation of the test. The interference rings are still focused at the
infinity, but their angular radius is reduced by a factor f/F,
where f = absolute value of the divergent collimating lens, and F
= focal length of the objective of the Heliostar (F= 630 mm). In other
words, the diameter of the interference rings is the same as
it would be with the "standard " protocol (i.e. using
the etalon alone) using a camera lengs of 135 mm ×
f/ F, instead of 135 mm.