Measurement in diffuse light using a hydrogen discharge lamp
In this test, the Fabry-Perot
etalon is used as an interferometer. The whole the surface of the etalon is
sampled. The FWHM, FSR and air-gap are derived from the measurements of
the fringe system.
The etalon is removed from the
Heliostar 100. The divergent is removed. The convergent lens is
kept since is has no impact on the test. The optical setup is:
Optical setup:hydrogren
lamp => diffuser => W25 filter (to remove continuum from hydrogen
lamp => convergent lens next to the etalon (no impact on the
fringe system) => etalon (without divergent collimating lens, the
side facing the Sun face the telephotolens) => 135 mm f/1.8
Sigma lens (focused to the infinite) with Nikon Z7
II.
1 - Etalon tuned on Ha

Interference fringes obtained with the etalon tunedo n t Ha.
Sigma 135 mm f/1.8 - Nikon Z7 II - RAW mode - 14-bit acquisition - 4 s exposure time - 100 ISO
Fit of the inteference profile with Fityk using Voigt functions:
Raw FWHM = 0.43 A.
Deconvoluated FWHM = 0.34 A (based on measured FWHM of hydrogen lamp = 0.263 A).
FSR = 10.4 A.
Air-gap is 0.20 mm ± 0.01 mm
2 - Etalon at Ha + 0.26 A

Interference fringes obtained with the etalon tuned at Ha +0.26 A.
Sigma 135 mm f/1.8 - Nikon Z7 II - RAW mode - 14-bit acquisition - 1 s exposure time - 100 ISO
Fit of the inteference profile with Fityk using Voigt functions:
Raw FWHM = 0.33 A.
Deconvoluated FWHM = 0.21 A.
FSR = 10.4 A.
Air-gap is 0.20 mm ± 0.01 mm
3 - Etalon not compressed (CWL = Ha + 0.44 A)
Raw FWHM = 0.36 A,
deconvoluated FWHM = 0.24 A.
Three different measurements were made with the etalon tuned on Ha in
order to evaluate the dispersion of results. FWHM was from 0.39 A to
0.44 A (i.e within ± 0.03A)
Qualitative
and quantitative estimation of the uniformity of the etalon and
visualization of the impact of mechanical compression on the FWHM
Principle:
- The test evaluates qualitatively the uniformity of transmission of
the etalon over its full aperture. Non uniformities can come from
coating non uniformities, surface roughness, non uniformity of the
cavity gap, etc.. These transmission non uniformities turn into non
uniformities of CWL and FWHM over the aperture of the etalon.
- The etalon is illuminated by a collimated beam coming from an
hydrogen discharge lamp. The uniformity of the etalon is examined using
a 135 mm f/1.8 lens focused on the etalon surface.
- If the etalon were completely uniform, its brightness would remain
constant across its entire aperture. Plages are brighter when the local
CWL on Ha. As the local CWL shifts from Ha, the plages become darker.
Though qualitative, the test is very sensitive. Additionally, it is all
the more sensitive that the FWHM of the etalon is small.
Important note:
- Uniformity of the etalon as no impact on the sweet spot. These
are completely different issues. Non uniformity only impacts the FWHM
and CWL of the etalon.
Optical setup:
hydrogen lamp => 3.0 mm aperture stop placed at the
focus of the convergent lens of the etalon of the Heliostar 100 (meaning the light beam incident on the
etalon is collimated, with a f-ratio = f/135 given the focal
length of the convergent lens) => etalon with its convergent lens, but without its divergent lens => 135
mm f/1.8 Sigma lens => Nikon Z7 II with focus set on the surface of the etalon


Comments:
- The bright areas are the areas on Ha (or very close). The dark areas are away from Ha.
- The compression
of the etalon increases from the image on the right (Ha +0.44 A, no compression) to the
image on the left. We can see the spider legs rotating accordingly.
- The two images on
the right are actually the same image displayed with different
visualization thresholds, with no etalon compression.
- Local measurements over an aperture of about 15 mm were done with the
etalon tuned to Ha, and the etalon not compressed. The
approximate positions are given by the circles on the second image on
the right.
- When there is no compression (position Ha + 0.44 A), the CWL of the etalon
is uniform to ± 0.02 A, except on its right side where the CWL shifts by about 0.2 A.
- When the etalon is tuned to Ha, the CWL of the etalon
is still quite good with about 3/4 of the aperture on Ha. On the left side there is a CWL shift of about 0.2 A,
- With more compression, only the outer rim is on Ha.
- Note that non uniformities come from variations of CWL (about 0.2 A).
On the opposite, the FWHM is pretty uniform with only
minor variations (about ±-0.02 A).
- All in all, the CWL non uniformities are very small, which explains the very small value of the FWHM.
Measurement of the FWHM of the Blocking Filter using a diode as a light source
Optical setup:
diode => 5 mm aperture hole => 55 mm f/8 collimator =>
Blocking Filter => Solex f_c = 80 mm, f_im= 125 mm, 1200 lpmm, IMX585
dispersion = 0.192 A/pixel
Transmission is measured to about ±5%.
The filter is 3-cavity (BW at 10% peak transmission < 1.5 × FWHM)